Robot | Path | Permission |
GoogleBot | / | ✔ |
BingBot | / | ✔ |
BaiduSpider | / | ✔ |
YandexBot | / | ✔ |
User-agent: |
Title | Moving on from Windows Communication Foundation | |
Description | Alternatives to WCF or Windows Communication |
Keywords | wcf,soa,microservices,grpc,dotnet,dotnet core |
WebSite | unwcf.com |
Host IP | 54.211.114.166 |
Location | United States |
Site | Rank |
US$294,307
Last updated: 2023-05-13 19:12:04
unwcf.com has Semrush global rank of 35,963,561. unwcf.com has an estimated worth of US$ 294,307, based on its estimated Ads revenue. unwcf.com receives approximately 33,959 unique visitors each day. Its web server is located in United States, with IP address 54.211.114.166. According to SiteAdvisor, unwcf.com is safe to visit. |
Purchase/Sale Value | US$294,307 |
Daily Ads Revenue | US$272 |
Monthly Ads Revenue | US$8,151 |
Yearly Ads Revenue | US$97,801 |
Daily Unique Visitors | 2,264 |
Note: All traffic and earnings values are estimates. |
Host | Type | TTL | Data |
unwcf.com. | A | 300 | IP: 54.211.114.166 |
unwcf.com. | A | 300 | IP: 161.35.60.200 |
unwcf.com. | NS | 3600 | NS Record: dns3.p06.nsone.net. |
unwcf.com. | NS | 3600 | NS Record: dns4.p06.nsone.net. |
unwcf.com. | NS | 3600 | NS Record: dns1.p06.nsone.net. |
unwcf.com. | NS | 3600 | NS Record: dns2.p06.nsone.net. |
UnWCF Moving on from Windows Communication Foundation What About Transactions? 2019-06-12 wcf Mark Rendle A few people have asked about the alternative to WCF’s distributed transaction support, as implemented with [TransactionFlow] attributes and the .NET TransactionScope type. That built-in support for complex transaction management was one of the best features of WCF, but it’s also one of the reasons why a wholesale port to .NET Core is so difficult: under the covers, WCF’s transactions were managed by the Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MSDTC), which is a Windows service and is integrated with Microsoft’s (and other vendors’) software when that software is running on Windows. Continue reading microservices transactions WCF vs gRPC - Round 2 2019-06-05 comparisons Mark Rendle After my previous post comparing WCF to gRPC, a couple of people on Twitter and in the comments asked which WCF binding I had used for the performance comparison. The answer to that was “whatever |
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate content-length: 33 content-type: text/plain date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:33:09 GMT location: https://unwcf.com/ server: Netlify x-nf-request-id: 01FQFNEVYSVFA163E0N640Z524 age: 0 HTTP/2 200 cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:33:09 GMT etag: "01fbbd055ccc6d906f0c25cd47a921ef-ssl" strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000 age: 0 server: Netlify x-nf-request-id: 01FQFNEW7FEDE1G5BZNFCD5H53 |
Domain Name: UNWCF.COM Registry Domain ID: 2391416537_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net Registrar URL: http://www.gandi.net Updated Date: 2021-05-13T11:37:37Z Creation Date: 2019-05-16T10:02:31Z Registry Expiry Date: 2022-05-16T10:02:31Z Registrar: Gandi SAS Registrar IANA ID: 81 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@support.gandi.net Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Name Server: DNS1.P06.NSONE.NET Name Server: DNS2.P06.NSONE.NET Name Server: DNS3.P06.NSONE.NET Name Server: DNS4.P06.NSONE.NET DNSSEC: unsigned >>> Last update of whois database: 2021-12-25T07:48:57Z <<< |